AI workflows for SEO and content
Less repetitive work. More time for expert decisions.
Briefs are rebuilt from scratch, content goes through endless revisions or reports lead nowhere? I help you add AI to a clearly defined SEO or content process, with approved inputs, explicit handovers and human approval.
FEEDBACK ON GOOGLE
Good work. Real feedback.
What clients say about working with me — directly on Google.
The outcome
What you can put to work
We start with a specific use case and a bounded pilot. You receive a documented workflow, reusable templates, review criteria and a handover to your team. We assess its value based on the process actually tested.
- Process review and selection of a suitable use case
- A pilot with inputs, templates, review steps and clear ownership
- Documentation, team handover and assessment of quality and effort
Illustrative working template · not a client result
Where AI can support your workflow
| Situation / input | Review / work | Decision / handover |
|---|---|---|
| Content briefs | Structure the audience, page purpose, search intent and approved sources | Editors check completeness, priorities and unresolved facts. |
| Editorial drafts | Develop an initial outline or draft from approved material | Subject experts check statements, evidence, tone and usefulness. |
| Content updates | Compare existing copy with updated product information or sources | Review the proposed changes and approve the revised version. |
| Reporting | Combine verified metrics and change logs into a draft | A responsible person checks figures, interpretation and next steps. |
Example: an editorial workflow
Quality checks are part of the process.
- Approved sources
- AI-assisted draft
- Fact and source checks
- Human approval
Unresolved facts return to the source material or a subject expert. A plausible-sounding draft is not treated as verified evidence.
Your starting point
Bring your concrete challenge.
We clarify your goal, available material and a useful scope before starting.
Working together
A clear path from the first discussion to handover
- 01Review the process and recurring bottlenecks
- 02Choose a use case and quality criteria
- 03Test a pilot with approved material
- 04Compare effort and quality with the existing process
- 05Document the workflow and hand it over to the team
Scope and responsibilities
I focus on SEO and content processes. Custom software, production integrations, tool licences and ongoing operations are scoped separately where needed. Confidential data belongs only in approved systems. There is no automatic publishing and no blanket promise of time savings or rankings.
Questions about AI workflows
Do we need a new tool?
Not necessarily. We review your existing tools and approved systems before recommending changes. Costs and responsibilities are agreed before any subscription or production integration.
How do we assess whether the pilot helps?
We define a comparable task and acceptance criteria first, then record actual work and review effort, factual issues and necessary revisions. We do not substitute a generic efficiency claim for that assessment.
What must we provide?
A recurring task, a responsible person, approved source material and clarity on which tools may process the information.
Let’s define the right next step.
Tell me about your website, goal and current challenge.
